Law Home2024-07-01T15:07:59+00:00
Loading...

Experience Matters When it Comes to Tackling Tough Cases!

Contact Nacol Law Firm for help with Child Custody, Child Support, Child Visitation, Parental Alienation, Paternity, Interstate Jurisdiction, Property Division and Business Asset Protection.

Dallas Divorce Attorneys, Mark Nacol and Julian Nacol

Based in Dallas, Texas, the Nacol Law Firm PC, traces its roots to the firm of Mark A. Nacol and Associates PC, established in 1979. The Nacol Law Firm team shares its experience on a variety of legal topics here.  See our recent posts below.

Preventing Custodial Parent From Relocating Children Out of State

Mom and Dad are divorcing or have been divorced and are now sharing joint custody of their children in the same city in Texas.  One parent receives a letter from the other parent’s attorney requesting that this parent be allowed to relocate the children to another state so he/she may take a better job position with another company!  This is a dilemma no parent ever wants to experience!  Child Custody cases involving interstate relocation jurisdiction issues cause much heartache and are costly legal battles.

What can a Parent do to protect themselves from children being relocated away from the non-moving parent to another state without her/his consent?   How may this affect the parent’s relationship with the children?

The Texas Family Code 153.002 Best Interest of Child states “The best interest of the child shall always be the primary consideration of the court in determining the primary consideration of the court in determining the issues of conservatorship and possession of and access to the child.”

The Texas Family code does not elaborate on the specific requirement for modification in the residency-restriction context, and there are no specific statutes governing residency restrictions or their removal for purposes of relocation. Texas Courts have no statutory standards to apply to this context.

The Texas Legislature has provided Texas Family Code 153.001, a basic framework on their public policy for all suits affecting the parent-child relationship:

  1. The public policy of this state is to:

  1. Assure the children will have frequent and continuing contact with parents who have shown the ability to act in the best interest of the child;

  2. Provide a safe, stable, and nonviolent environment for the child;

  3. Encourage parents to share in the rights and duties of raising their child after the parents have separated or dissolved their marriage.

How does The State of Texas treat an initial Child Custody determination?

Texas Family Code 152.201 of the UCCJEA states, among other things, that a court may rule on custody issues if the Child:

*Has continually lived in that state for 6 months or longer and Texas was the home state of the child within six months before the commencement of the legal proceeding.

*Was living in the state before being wrongfully abducted elsewhere by a parent seeking custody in another state. One parent continues to live in Texas.

*Has an established relationship with people (family, relatives or teachers), ties, and attachments in the state

*Has been abandoned in an emergency: or is safe in the current state, but could be in danger of neglect or abuse in the home state

Relocation is a child custody situation which will turn on the individual facts of the specific case, so that each case is tried on its own merits.

Most child custody relocation cases tried in Texas follow a predictable course:

  1. Allowing or not allowing the move.

  2. Order of psychological evaluations or social studies of family members

  3. Modification of custody and adjusting of child’s time spent with parents

  4. Adjusting child support

  5. Order of mediation to settle dispute

  6. Allocating transportation costs

  7. Order opposing parties to provide all information on child’s addresses and telephone #

Help to Prevent Your Child’s Relocation in a Texas Court by Preparing Your Case!  

  1. Does the intended relocation interfere with the visitation rights of the non- moving parent?

  2. The effect on visitation and communication with the non-moving parent to maintain a full and continuous relationship with the child

  3. How will this move affect extended family relationships living in the child’s current location?

  4. Are there bad faith motives evident in the relocating parent?

  5. Can the non-moving parent relocate to be close to the child? If not, what type of separation hardship would the child have?

  6. The relocating parent’s desire to accommodate a new job, spouse, or other criteria above the parent-child relationship. A Parent’s personal desire for move rather than need to move?

  7. Is there a significant degree of economic, emotional or education enhancement for the relocating parent and child in this move?

  8. Any violation of an order or prior notice of the intended move or a temporary restraining order

  9. Are Special Needs/ Talents accommodated for the child in this move?

  10. Fear of child and high cost of travel expenses for non-moving parent or child to visit each other to be able to continue parent- child relationship.

  11. What other Paramount Concerns would affect the child concerning the relocation from the non-moving parent?

At the Nacol Law Firm PC, we represent many parents trying to prevent their child from relocating to another city or state and having to experience “A Long Distance Parental Relationship” brought on by a better job or new life experience of the relocating parent! We work at persuading courts to apply the specific, narrow exceptions to these general rules in order to have child custody cases heard in the most convenient forum in which the most qualifying, honest evidence is available; cases where the child’s home state or other basic questions are clarified, and cases where a parent has the right in close proximity with their child regardless of other less important factors.

High Asset Divorces: Divorce Litigation

High Assets Divorces in Texas can be painstaking and involve substantial time and money to properly litigate an individual’s case.

  1. Original Petition and Temporary Orders

Single most important event for leverage is who files their Divorce Petition first. If you file first you are a Petitioner. A Petitioner receives a crucial benefit in litigation. A petitioner is afforded the opportunity to talk  first and last in litigation, sets the tempo of the divorce, and creates the narrative of the litigation. Being a Petitioner is invaluable, thus if you have decided to file you should look to file first. 

Temporary Orders are usually, absent emergency relief, the first hearing the Court will have in the case. At temporary orders the Judge will likely attempt to place a Band-Aid on all assets to insure there is not wasting of assets, custody and access of the children are determined, and payments remain the same of any separate or community property assets. Temporary spousal maintenance, exclusive use of property, and injunctions are granted at this hearing. With High Assets this hearing is pivotal in determining how litigation will continue in the future. Every Court is different but multiple additional temporary order may be filed or clarification motions. 

2. Discovery Phase and Experts

The discovery phase may be cumbersome and painful. Discovery consists of multiple written questions. These include production questions (asking for documentation), interrogatories (questions require a written notarized response), admission (admit or deny questions), depositions (typically 6 hour cross examination in front of court reporter at an attorney’s office), and inventory and appraisal (sworn list of assets and values of each asset). These process are usually expensive but necessary to prove the amount of the marital estate and the characterization of property. 

Experts are also employed at this stage. They are costly but necessary to prove tracing, value of fraud, or overall value of the business. These issue are likely contested, thus the battle of experts continue until the final hearing.

3. Depositions

A deposition is a formal question-and-answer session used in divorce cases to gather information under oath before trial. It typically takes place in a lawyer’s office, where one spouse (the deponent) answers questions from the opposing attorney while a court reporter records everything. The purpose of a deposition is to uncover facts, clarify disputes, and assess how a witness may testify in court. While it doesn’t happen in a courtroom, the statements made during a deposition carry legal weight and can be used as evidence later.

In high-asset divorces, depositions become even more critical because of the complex financial issues involved. Attorneys may ask detailed questions about business ownership, real estate holdings, investments, hidden assets, trusts, and even potential misuse of marital funds. If one spouse suspects the other of concealing wealth, forensic accountants or financial experts may analyze records and testify about discrepancies. The opposing attorney may also scrutinize spending habits, tax returns, and financial disclosures to ensure full transparency.

Because high-asset divorces often involve prenuptial agreements, inheritance disputes, or business valuations, preparation is crucial. A well-prepared spouse will work closely with their attorney to review financial documents and anticipate tough questions. While depositions can feel intense, remaining truthful, composed, and strategic can help protect one’s financial interests and ensure a fair resolution.

4. Mediation

Meditation may occur in the middle or toward the end of the litigation process. A good mediator may range from $2,000.00 to $3,500.00 per side. The mediation process can be difficult and last from a half to more than a full day. Some mediations go for 14 to 15 hours to obtain settlement. Though this is expensive it is still less costly than going to final trial and many outcomes may be obtain by agreement to which a Judge cannot order. The flexibility of mediation makes this process less painful and costly than attending final trial.  

5. Final Trial before the Court or Jury

Final trial may be performed solely by a  Judge or a Jury of 12 peers. Only 10 of 12 Jury members are needed to find in favor of either party. A Jury trial is more expensive, takes more time to prepare, and may be more risky depending on the County. A trial before the Judge is cheaper and may simplify many matters. It is important to know for every 1 hour in Court it takes more or less 4 hours to prepare.

A jury trial with a minimum of 2 experts and multiple other fact witness should take anywhere from 4 to 7 days. A trial before the Judge for a similar case may take 2-4 days, depending how the judge runs the Court. 

There are many trials and tribulations an individual will have to surpass in the Court system if they are getting a divorce and the marriage contained with high assets. It will likely be costly, painful, but necessary. Many other factors such as summary judgements or motions to exclude experts, witnesses, or exhibits may increase fees. It is important to be confident with your attorney and find a firm that has experience with higher assets cases to ensure the flow and strategy of the litigation fulfills your goals. 

High Asset Divorce Attorneys in Dallas Texas
Nacol Law Firm P.C. 
(972) 690-3333

Questions about a legal issue? Ask our experts

Go to Top